Author: Phil Pennock Date: To: exim-dev Subject: Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 1184] code refactoring in acl.c
On 2012-03-30 at 06:51 -0700, Todd Lyons wrote: > But then I get slight errors on each test. This is typical output:
> 220 the.local.host.name ESMTP Exim 4.77_1102-226c389 Tue, 2 Mar 1999
> 09:44:33 +0000
> 220 the.local.host.name ESMTP Exim x.yz Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
So the version number should have been changed in the tested binary by
Looks as though the last changes were by me in October when I found that
the new version numbers generated by the build system were not handled
by the test suite, so I fixed the tests to run as part of the release
Further, it looks like I missed some other output formats.
runtest normalises output. Looks like the regexp isn't matching that
version string. The underscore is the problem.
I've fixed patchexim to handle this variant too.
This message was posted to the following mailing lists: