Author: Andreas Metzler Date: To: exim-users Subject: Re: [exim] [exim-dev] Exim 4.80 RC7 uploaded
Phil Pennock <pdp@???> wrote:
[...] > I thought that this was a *new* check as part of the revamp and that
> before there was no minimum bound. I changed so many things I've lost
> track. > In fact, *before* changing we had:
> That's the function call which changes the minimum. So this is *not* a
> regression and Exim 4.77 would have been rejecting this too! [...]
it should have afaict from the code, however it did not as can be
tested when trying to connect to such a broken host. (See
I am posting this information here for completeness sake, IMHO the
solution in GIT (keep 1024 limit, but add tls_dh_min_bits SMTP transport
option) is perfectly fine. Which is why we have applied the patch
to Debian's exim package.
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
This message was posted to the following mailing lists: